PLEASE CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY
SPEECH BY
MR. THARMAN SHANMUGARATNAM, SENIOR MINISTER OF STATE FOR EDUCATION AND TRADE AND INDUSTRY
AT THE STANFORD GLOBAL ENTREPRENEURS CHALLENGE 2002 ON MONDAY, 8 JULY, 9.30 AM, AT GUILD
HALL, NUS GUILD HOUSE
NURTURING ENTREPRENEURSHIP FOR FUTURE ECONOMIC GROWTH
Professor Shih Choon Fong, President and Vice-Chancellor of NUS
Professor Tom Kosnik, Consulting Professor, Stanford University and
Advisor to the Stanford Global Entrepreneurs Challenge
Mr. Prakash Narayanan, Chairman of the GEC Organizing Committee
Distinguished guests
Ladies and gentlemen
Good morning
INTRODUCTION : BUILDING VIBRANT INNOVATION SYSTEMS
1. I am very pleased
indeed to be here this morning to address such an exciting and dynamic group of young
talents from around the globe. You have come from top universities in the US, Europe and
Asia. In coming to Singapore to participate in this Global Entrepreneurs Challenge, you
have demonstrated a small dose of the entrepreneurial spirit itself - a desire to take on
a new challenge and push your boundaries.
2. We have entered the
knowledge-based economy, globally. Among the higher income Asian countries, economic
growth will be increasingly driven by the ability to innovate - not the ability to absorb
and adapt advances made elsewhere, or to make existing products efficiently. Growth will
be innovation-driven, not efficiency-driven.
3. The most successful
countries will be those that build and sustain vibrant innovation systems - the
institutions and networks that support continuous innovation. How well they do this will
depend on the deliberate actions of governments, universities and industry players, and
the interactions between the three. And there will always be an unplanned or serendipitous
dimension to innovation, given the flux of social and market circumstances.
4. There is some consensus on
what it takes to build innovative economic systems, and stay in the new, knowledge-based
global competition.
5. First, and most
fundamental, are skills and research capabilities. Innovative economies will depend
on an adequate supply of highly educated manpower. Without skills of a high order, we will
not be able to create new and differentiated products, develop new business models, or
manage complex international supply chains. University-business linkages are
increasingly critical in developing these capabilities.
6. Second, markets
have to be allowed to work. Intellectual property protection, competitive domestic
markets and an openness to trade and foreign investment enhance innovation. New ideas with
commercial potential must also have access to funding. Venture capital has to be in
adequate supply, and banks have to develop the skills and risk management systems needed
for lending to young companies without collateral.
7. Third, an
innovative economic system requires entrepreneurs, and a culture that respects
entrepreneurs. A society with high levels of knowledge and management skills will not
produce the breakthroughs in products or processes needed for economic advance without a
strong base of entrepreneurs, and a spirit of entrepreneurship that extends across
society. It will not create value from knowledge. This entrepreneurial culture is what the
famed economist J M Keynes called 'animal spirits' - the gut instincts to create and find
a market or perish.
8. Each of these three
dimensions - skills and research, competitive markets governed by the rule of law, and the
entrepreneurial culture - and the interaction between them, are essential for a vibrant
innovation system. Further, while innovation systems have strong national characteristics,
success now depends critically on openness and linkages with innovation systems in other
countries - and especially with the global centres of excellence among universities,
research institutions and commercial laboratories. Strong innovation systems depend not
only on the local environment but on the global connectedness of local research activities
and industry clusters.
NURTURING ENTREPRENEURSHIP
9. There is a growing body of
research on the mystery of entrepreneurship, and we now know a little more about it than
when Keynes spoke of animal spirits. Entrepreneurship, put shortly, is the act of
discovering, evaluating and exploiting opportunities. Exploiting opportunities involves
anticipating risk, and accepting the possibility of failure.
10. Most people agree that the basic
ingredients of entrepreneurship lie in personality traits, especially a
creative imagination, the desire to achieve and make a difference, and the tenacity to
persevere in the face of failure. Very little of this can be taught. But what we do
know is that entrepreneurship can be brought to the surface and nurtured by the
environment, just as it can be thwarted. A favourable environment makes it much less
likely for entrepreneurial talent to stay latent.
11. For entrepreneurial talent to surface
and thrive, we need the support and recognition - of teachers and parents, and of peers -
of individuals who want to venture out and try doing something new. Society at large should
see failure as a stage to success. It is these social values that distinguish the
pro-enterprise cultures of countries like the US from the anti-enterprise cultures of
countries like Japan, or even the UK. Surveys find that a majority of people in Japan and
the UK, even after Thatcher, do not regard starting a business as a respected occupation.
I do not have equivalent findings for Singapore. From all accounts, social respect for
those who start a business, and the tolerance for failure, has been low. But I suspect it
is now rising.
12. It helps to have role models -
local examples of individuals making serious amounts of money by taking a different route
and working hard at it, and those that have made it big after first failing.
13. Finally, some of the skills
required for entrepreneurship can be taught, in educational institutions and through
mentoring by real-world practitioners - skills such as market opportunity analysis,
hedging your risks, raising funds, team building, networking and negotiation with
investors.
14. Educational institutions, especially
tertiary educational institutions, can therefore play a significant role in giving room
for the entrepreneurial spirit to develop, and in nurturing the entrepreneurial skills of
a society. It has been said that "The best way to think about the future is to invent
it." To which we might add that the best way to invent the future is to educate and
nurture the people who will invent it.
15. To play this role, educational
institutions must themselves be prepared to innovate. They have to be willing to
experiment with new methods of teaching and learning, as we are seeking to do in
Singapore. They will have to bring the excitement of the world of scientific and business
innovation into the classroom, and provide opportunities for students to learn through
practice and access to practitioners.
16. Business plan competitions are one
such device that is proving useful. Besides learning business planning skills, the whole
process of the competition encourages students to engage in team-building, hones their
presentation and networking skills, and facilitates feedback and mentoring by the
practitioners who serve as judges and advisors. Many leading universities in the world
have now introduced business plan competitions, and many "real" and successful
ventures have emerged from these competitions. I am pleased to note that the National
University of Singapore has initiated a nation-wide business plan competition in Singapore
called StartUp@Singapore since 1999, and that dozens of new ventures have been created as
a result.
17. Stanford University pioneered the
first Global Entrepreneurs Challenge in 2000 at its campus, in the heart of Silicon
Valley. By bringing winning teams and organizers of business plan competitions from around
the world together, the GEC plays a catalytic role in raising standards and encouraging
the use of business plan competitions as a tool for entrepreneurship education. I am
pleased that Stanford has chosen to partner with the National University of Singapore
(NUS) to bring the second GEC to Singapore this year. It points to Singapore's role as an
emerging hub of innovation in Asia. It also reflects NUS' record of excellence in teaching
and research, and status as a leading player in the Asia Pacific in entrepreneurship
education. (In 1999, NUS collaborated with MIT to organize in Singapore the first Global
Start Up Workshop outside the US. The success of that event has led to subsequent annual
replication of the workshop around the world. I am sure that this first GEC outside the US
will likewise lead to many more such events around the world in the future. NUS has also
collaborated with Stanford University and the University of Pennsylvania in launching its
entrepreneurship-focused Overseas College Program in the Silicon Valley and Philadelphia
regions respectively. NUS recently partnered with the Herbert Quandt Foundation of Germany
to initiate a German-Asian Young Entrepreneurial Leaders Forum. NUS is now also playing a
leadership role in promoting entrepreneurship education among member universities in the
Association of Pacific Rim universities.)
ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION IN SCHOOLS
18. These initiatives by our universities
are very much in line with the Ministry of Education (MOE)'s goal of nurturing students
with the skills, knowledge and character to succeed in a knowledge-based era. Nurturing
entrepreneurial skills and habits is part and parcel of preparing our young for this
future. More of our students will have to be exposed to activities that promote these
skills, especially through co-curricula programmes outside the classroom.
19. Our approach to entrepreneurship
education in schools is reflected in two dimensions of the school experience. First,
through the curriculum, we are seeking to develop students who can think, explore and
experiment, independently and creatively. This is the reason MOE has cut down
curriculum content, to free up space for more open-ended learning and creative pursuit.
Under the Thinking Schools, Learning Nation programme, we have also infused critical
thinking skills across the curriculum and in revised assessment methods. We want students
to question, to understand how theories are arrived at, to probe their assumptions, and to
test them against reality.
20. To give students an additional platform to
develop thinking skills, project work has been introduced in both primary and secondary
schools. Project work encourages students to explore the inter-connectedness of different
areas of knowledge, to experiment, and to work collaboratively with their peers. All this
is more akin to the real world experience.
21. Second, the non-academic
curriculum plays a critical role in nurturing the skills and habits required for success
in the business world - being a good team player, being willing to take a risk, and
showing determination and resolve in the face of setbacks. Through participation in
co-curricular activities (CCAs) such as sports, students learn to interact and collaborate
with each other to achieve common goals, and to lead with confidence in adversity. They
learn to respond on their feet without relying on instructions or directions. And tough
training for competitions nurtures endurance and ruggedness in our students.
22. Students also engage in a number of
activities aimed more specifically at promoting entrepreneurial skills. A number of
schools and junior colleges have set up Enterprise Clubs, giving students the experience
of running mini-markets and other business activities. A growing number of schools are
participating in the Youth Entrepreneurship Challenge organised by Singapore Polytechnic.
Bizworld, a programme conceptualised by Tim Draper of the VC firm Draper Fisher Jurvetson,
teaches business, entrepreneurship and business concepts, and has seen more than 40
schools signing up since it was launched in March this year. A Youth Entrepreneur Network,
started by Youth Challenge, provides youth between the age of 16 to 25 with access to top
entrepreneurs in Singapore.
23. To encourage students to look beyond
their examinations, our university admission criteria have been revised to take into
account students' achievements in CCAs. In future, Project Work will also be part of the
admission criteria.
24. Looking ahead, MOE will continue to
explore new ways in which teachers and schools can deliver the kind of educational
experience that will help us grow our students into creators and entrepreneurs. We will
tap on experience around the world in exposing students to lessons of one form or another
in entrepreneurship, in schools and tertiary institutions.
25. More tie-ups between our schools and
our tertiary institutions, as well as with corporations, entrepreneurs and the community
sector, will help schools develop a richer programme of exposure to the world outside the
school, to excite and challenge their students. An example of schools' collaboration with
the private sector is the Citibank programme, Citisuccess: Partners in Innovation.
Besides the private sector, some of our schools are also working with the CDCs to fund
programmes to promote student entrepreneurship.
INNOVATIVE SCHOOLS AND TEACHERS
26. Finally, we need a spirit of
enterprise and innovation among educational institutions, teachers and lecturers
themselves. Teachers and lecturers who keep up with the times, and who try new approaches
in teaching and school management can infect their students with a certain openmindedness
and an enthusiasm for experimentation. A teacher or lecturer who is textbook bound, wants
only one answer, who errs on the side of caution, and who is a stickler for following past
practices will pass these attitudes on to his students.
27. We have undertaken a comprehensive
review of the Teaching Service, resulting in Edu-Pac or Education
Service Professional Development and Career
Plan. Through the Edu-Pac Plan we aim to motivate teachers to upgrade and re-orient
themselves professionally, and to continually think on their job so as open up new
freeways and byways for students to explore.
28. MOE has also introduced a variety of
awards and Funds to induce and reward teachers and schools to search for better ways to do
their work. (These included the Best Practice Award, the Outstanding Contribution Award,
the School Innovation Fund, MOE Innovation Fund and the INNERGY Award.)
CONCLUSION
29. In closing, let me thank the
organizers of GEC for giving me the opportunity to address you this morning. May I wish
all the participating teams every success in your entrepreneurial endeavours, and for
everyone, have a productive conference and a pleasant stay in Singapore.